ORBITING.MEMidburn · 2026
Preliminary wind-load and structural analysis · 2026-09-08

Plywood slice model

A retained-data assessment of a 12 mm orthotropic plywood assembly under a 30 m/s atmospheric-wind field. Plywood strength and sampled buckling stability are checked for the stated model and load; this is not certification.

Initial and deformed plywood assembly
Current 60 mm-target nonlinear result at wind ×1.3 and full gravity. True-scale X–Z projection: original blue, deformed red; no display amplification.

Separate plywood strength checks

ActionMaximum ratio
membrane 10.5219
membrane 20.4164
bending 10.6212
bending 20.5684
panel shear 120.5936
rolling shear 230.7444
planar shear 310.9893

Each action is compared with its own characteristic strength. Limit 1.0; ratios are not summed. The governing margin is 1.075%, not an uncertainty bound.

Decision summary

PASSExact-load numerical checks: nonlinear completion, force/moment equilibrium, and qualified tangent. Not a new mesh-convergence claim.
PASSPlywood strength: agreed separate panel action checks; maximum ratio 0.989253. All elements included, no summed interaction. Scope and recovery limitations: Appendix D.
PASSBuckling stability. Accepted sampled-path check at ×1.3: two meshes, seven states each, plus the exact-load tangent. See Appendix H.
REPORTEDDeformation. No acceptance criterion was supplied.
Strength verdict applies to the agreed separate checks.
The supplied 24 mm mean field is multiplied by 1.3; gravity and strengths are unchanged. No CFD-field correction or connector-force clipping is applied; an upper bound is not proven.
3.890 kNsource CFD resultant, before structural exclusions
4.975 kNincluded wind resultant applied at 1.3×
111.2 mmh060 nonlinear maximum, unscaled
2.87%of 3.874 m analysis height

What was analysed

111 included plywood solids at 65 stations, joined by 420 rigid 108 mm connector systems. Seven unsupported solids and the one-sided connector Rf9D are excluded.

All shell nodes at global Z<200 mm are bonded; 57 intersecting rigid connector systems transmit compatible grounding constraints.

What the answer means

The h060 nonlinear endpoint governs the separate action/capacity checks. Buckling stability uses the accepted h090/h060 sampled-path evidence; additional meshes are not required. The model does not validate real construction or design wind.

Parent configuration f7c4bf1001d755c506b12781fc8359b6cdab3ebb7a4c39005db58c9b449aeb90
Revised load identity 68fb56a205d008ac79a96d61b06a2d20cbc1735645099d4e9ca36ca4556ae48d

Method 1 · wind calculation and load selection

Maximum sampled direction and conservative load chain

Polar diagrams of signed force components and total CFD force
The direction screen used a tight XYZ box (24 × 13.44 × 7.68 m), 30 mm cells and 54 samples per angle. It selected 112.5° as the most prominent sampled direction. That direction was then rerun with a finer 24 mm lattice and expanded Y (24 × 20.16 × 7.68 m); only the completed finer run supplies the structural loads. 0° is +X, counter-clockwise toward +Y.

Used CFD parameters

Physical windNeutral log law, U(10 m)=30 m/s; z₀=0.020 m
Direction112.5°; unit (-0.382683, 0.923880)
Velocity XYZ(-11.481, 27.716, 0.0) m/s
Air20°C; 101.325 kPa; ρ=1.2041 kg/m³; ν=1.5160e-05 m²/s
LBMD3Q19, SRT, FP16S, Smagorinsky Cₛ=0.173266
Lattice24 mm; 1000×840×320 cells; Δt=6.000e-05 s
Windows34333 development steps; 214 samples across 2 windows, 1.600 s total
Domain XYZ24.00 × 20.16 × 7.68 m; Y only; X and Z unchanged from baseline

Force transferred to the structure

CFD cell sum3.890 kN
After exclusions3.827 kN
Analysis factor×1.3
Applied XYZ(-3.493, 3.542, 0.057) kN
Applied resultant4.975 kN
Updated mean load. Projected drag 3.607 kN; -25.35% versus the original 30 mm screen. Resolution, Y extent and sampling/development changed together. This is not an isolated sensitivity or a proven design-wind upper bound.
17.6%baseline bounding-box blockage
3.77 mbaseline lattice top headroom
112.5°selected direction; completed finer-load calculation

The structural factor of 1.3 is the user-supplied wind safety multiplier. It is not derived from a gust spectrum, return period, wind standard, pressure coefficient, or partial-factor system. It does not divide the plywood strengths. drag_mean_N is a projection only and is never added to the XYZ vector.

Method 2 · orthotropic shell model and numerical verification

From voxel forces to a constrained plywood assembly

Validate 118 watertight STL solids
Smooth and conserve 136,543 cell vectors
Project to exact slice silhouettes
Mesh quadratic S6 shells and patches
Solve linear + NLGEOM endpoints
Blender rendering of the retained fine quadratic shell mesh
Fine native mesh preview. Cyan marks connector-patch elements; red marks elements containing a sub-30 mm corner edge. The numerical gate uses measured spacing and response change, not the nominal target label.
True-scale frontal orthographic overlay of initial and nonlinear deflected geometry
h060 true-scale X–Z orthographic nonlinear overlay: initial blue, deflected red. Maximum unscaled displacement is 111.246 mm.

Used plywood stiffness and strengths

12 mm, 485 kg/m³. Homogeneous orthotropic plate law: E₁=8.231, E₂=3.826, E₃=0.500 GPa; G₁₂=0.350, G₁₃=0.050, G₂₃=0.040 GPa; ν₁₂=ν₁₃=ν₂₃=0.25.

Characteristic strengthDirectionMPa
Tension19.5
Tension28.9
Compression115.8
Compression214.8
Bending120.6
Bending213.3
Panel shear1-23.5
Planar shear3-11.0
Rolling shear2-30.8

Source: UPM/WISA declaration of performance. E₃, transverse shear moduli, and Poisson ratios are declared modelling assumptions, not published product values.

Reused 60 mm-target mesh; exact new load

92,378 S6 elements; 207,578 nodes. Measured median S6 nodal interval 22.729 mm. The nominal 60 mm target is not the actual interval.

Native restart at wind ×1.125 and full gravity → unchanged-load equilibrium hold → monotonic continuation to ×1.3. Original mesh, couplings, ground bonds and material are retained. No scaled nonlinear stresses or full rerun.

4 accepted hold/continuation increments; 0 cutbacks; maximum 2 Newton iterations; solve/export 198.1 s.

Force/moment equilibrium error 9.12e-07 / 1.77e-06 (gate 0.001). Exact-load tangent: PASS.

The retained h090/h060 pair supplies the accepted stability verification. Current stresses and displacements come from the exact ×1.3 h060 endpoint.

Native software

FluidX3D not recorded calculix_ccx 2.23 calculix_cgx installed; banner unavailable gmsh 4.15.2-git blender 5.2.1 ffmpeg 9.0.1

Result · visual review, stresses, connectors, and limits

Fixed-model response at 1.3× retained mean wind

Current video: nonlinear solution, wind ×1.3 plus gravity. PDF: embedded current-load still replaces playback. 18-second, 1920×1080, 30 fps H.264 sequence: smoothed wind → native mesh → nonlinear response at ×2 display scale. Open the video directly (HTML package).

Latest static result (h060)

Maximum nonlinear displacement111.246 mm
Maximum individual ratio0.9893
Individual limits (nonlinear)PASS
Material conclusionPASS
Buckling stability (sampled path)PASS

Nonlinear connector demand (420 systems)

MeanσMaximum
Force127.4 N151.9 N722.9 N
TV57UI
Moment10.81 N·m13.21 N·m85.02 N·m
TV5zSI

Separate supplied capacities: 1000.0 N / 100.0 N m. Force PASS, moment PASS. These attachment wrenches are not adhesive, fastener, or cube stress checks.

Principal limitations

  • 24 mm aerodynamic sheets represent physical 12 mm plywood; no validated high-Re wall model.
  • Mean loads only: no gust, peak, covariance, duration, return period, or code factors.
  • Ground bond, rigid connectors, homogeneous plywood, and one fixed grain realization idealise construction.
  • No joint/adhesive/fastener strength, foundation compliance, damage, moisture, or fatigue model.
  • Sampled buckling stability PASS; no continuous-path, untested-imperfection, ultimate-capacity or post-collapse guarantee.

Read with the appendices. Latest repaired-solver results and replacement list: Appendix H. Supplied connector capacities: 1000.0 N and 100.0 N m, separate checks. This web edition keeps the report figures and selected evidence records. Large solver arrays and native project files are outside the display bundle.

Appendix A · CFD model, full direction sweep, and render provenance

Wind-field construction and angular envelope

FluidX3D near-streamwise velocity rendering at 112.5 degrees
Frozen final instantaneous Q-criterion field from the current 112.5° case, step 60999. Camera-only visualization, not a mean-field or transient animation.
FluidX3D signed surface-force rendering at 112.5 degrees
Actual 214-sample cell-mean force surface, before structural Laplacian smoothing. Render-only framing shifts are not used for load mapping.

Physical setup

The precursor solves a neutral atmospheric boundary layer with U(z)=30·ln(z/0.02)/ln(10/0.02) m/s and no-slip ground. Its X–Z field is rotated into the requested angle and replicated across Y. Recovered U(10 m)=30.0176 m/s.

Momentum exchange is summed only on object cells marked TYPE_S|TYPE_X; ground is excluded. The resultant is a set of discrete forces, not continuous pressure tractions.

Numerical setup

D3Q19 lattice, SRT collision, FP16S distribution storage, equilibrium inflow/outflow, and Smagorinsky–Lilly SGS. Precursor 1000×5×480; object 1000×840×320.

Structural mean: 214 samples, 2 windows, 1.599960 s; steps 34333–60958. Drag CV=0.275%. Two-window stationarity: PASS; successive drag/vector change 0.087% / 0.265%.

Sixteen retained directions

AngleFx kNFy kNFz kNResultant kNProjected drag kNn
0.0°2.692-0.0210.1922.6992.69254
22.5°3.0910.5720.2043.1503.07554
45.0°3.6802.1670.2774.2794.13454
67.5°2.3363.9380.2224.5844.53254
90.0°-0.1964.6910.0704.6964.69154
112.5°-2.7294.1030.0154.9274.83554
135.0°-3.8972.5130.0954.6384.53354
157.5°-3.2560.8950.0293.3773.35154
180.0°-2.4380.0810.0422.4402.43854
202.5°-2.845-0.6560.0352.9202.88054
225.0°-3.222-2.2320.1353.9223.85654
247.5°-2.100-3.8910.1194.4244.39954
270.0°-0.035-4.5880.1234.5904.58854
292.5°2.389-4.0480.2524.7074.65454
315.0°3.761-2.3560.3264.4504.32554
337.5°3.503-0.7400.2063.5863.52054

The tight-box angular screen establishes the sampled direction ranking, not final force magnitudes. The finer expanded-Y calculation at 112.5° supplies the final field. The continuous angular maximum has not been measured.

Appendix B · spatial, boundary, collision, and lattice-headroom sensitivity

Earlier sensitivity evidence and remaining headroom

CFD grid sensitivity chart at 112.5 degrees
Earlier fixed-box short screens, not the current expanded-Y mean. The 24 mm screen lowers drag 17.18%; the 60 mm force history oscillates strongly.
CFD boundary-domain sensitivity chart at 112.5 degrees
At 30 mm, Y expansion is the dominant individual boundary effect; combined XYZ expansion lowers drag 17.60%.

Resolution

Cell / gridDragΔAssessment
60 mm
400x224x128
5.927 kN22.66%under-resolved oscillation
30 mm
800x448x256
4.832 kN0.00%original short screen
24 mm
1000x560x320
4.002 kN-17.18%short-screen refinement

Domain

BoxDragΔ
Baseline
24 x 13.44 x 7.68 m
4.832 kN0.00%
X Expanded
36 x 13.44 x 7.68 m
4.791 kN-0.86%
Y Expanded
24 x 20.16 x 7.68 m
4.210 kN-12.88%
Z Expanded
24 x 13.44 x 11.52 m
4.765 kN-1.39%
Combined Expanded
36 x 20.16 x 11.52 m
3.982 kN-17.60%
SRT and TRT collision sensitivity chart
TRT changed drag by about 20% and produced boundary/field warning signs; it is rejected for this experiment.
Smagorinsky coefficient sensitivity chart
Cₛ=0.10–0.23 gives a 3.57% drag envelope; the low-Cₛ field itself has poor quality.
Load-field provenance: The tight-box angular screen selected 112.5°. The completed finer run at that direction uses a 24 mm lattice and a 24×20.16×7.68 m box with expanded Y. Its retained mean vectors supply the structural load, multiplied by ×1.3.

The tables above describe sensitivity evidence, not additional structural load cases. Direction screening and the completed final force field have distinct resolutions and sampling windows.

Appendix C · geometry, force mapping, connectors, exclusions, and supports

Structural idealisation and conservation checks

Blender visualization of the smoothed CFD force vectors on the plywood assembly
All 136,543 smoothed vectors are instanced in Blender and oriented by their actual XYZ direction. P95 length/colour clipping is display-only.
Binned CFD projected force map
Full force history for the current case, spanning both averaging windows. Structural loading uses the time-mean vector field, not its final instantaneous frame.

Geometry and exclusions

Source STL363,964 triangles; 118 watertight, consistently wound solids; 65 stations
Source bounds7.692×6.969×3.913 m
Retained graph111 solids, 420 two-sided connectors
Excluded7 solids + Rf9D; 2.429 kg
Connector model108×108×108 mm analytical rigid system; 0.4 kg static-equivalent weight at reference

Mapping and smoothing

Each lattice site is inverse-transformed into the original STL frame and assigned to its declared slice. Sites outside the silhouette are projected only within the cell YZ half-diagonal (16.971 mm); 28 sites moved, maximum 2.189 mm.

Two four-neighbour Y–Z Jacobi/Laplacian steps at relaxation 0.5 reduce neighbour RMS jump from 0.070 to 0.031 N. A constrained correction preserves force and origin moment per station.

Load conservation

StageFx kNFy kNFz kN|F| kN|M₀| kN·m
All smoothed CFD cells-2.72652.77470.05393.8904—
Included, factor 1.0-2.68692.72470.04423.82695.3895
Included, factor 1.3-3.49303.54210.05744.97507.0063
Supports: every included S6 corner or midside node with global Z<0.200 m is fixed in six shell degrees of freedom. When a rigid patch overlaps that region, translations are fixed through the full-rank connector reference to avoid duplicate SPC/MPC equations; patch rotations retain shell SPCs. This is a locally bonded-ground idealisation, not a model of footing compliance.

Barycentric nodal distribution is nonnegative and conserves each force. Current ×1.3 endpoint support-reaction mismatch is 9.12e-05% in force and 1.77e-04% in moment about the origin.

Appendix D · plywood model, material axes, allowables, and interpretation

Orthotropic constants and characteristic-strength checks

CalculiX engineering constants

ConstantUsed valueBasis
E₁8.231 GPapublished bending stiffness
E₂3.826 GPapublished bending stiffness
E₃0.500 GPaassumed
G₁₂0.350 GPapublished plate shear
G₁₃0.050 GPaassumed transverse shear
G₂₃0.040 GPaassumed transverse shear
ν₁₂, ν₁₃, ν₂₃0.25assumed
Density485 kg/m³published mean
Thickness12 mmsource geometry / product

Characteristic strengths used

ModeAxisMPa
Tension19.5
Tension28.9
Compression115.8
Compression214.8
Bending120.6
Bending213.3
Panel shear1-23.5
Planar shear3-11.0
Rolling shear2-30.8

Whole-panel values for all seven bonded veneers of one 12 mm sheet, not individual veneer strengths. Do not multiply or divide by seven. Direction 1 follows face grain; 2 is transverse in-plane; 3 is through-thickness. Tension/compression selection is sign-dependent.

Material-axis policy: one PCG64 angle drawn uniformly on [0°,180°) for each physical station, seed 20260902; disconnected contours at a station share that angle. This is a single fixed realization, not a stochastic reliability analysis and not randomisation of the seven internal veneers.

How stresses are reduced

  1. CalculiX expands each S6 shell to a three-dimensional C3D15 representation.
  2. Top/bottom stresses are resolved into membrane and bending terms and transformed to station material axes.
  3. Membrane tension/compression, directional bending, panel shear, rolling shear, and planar shear are divided by the characteristic strengths above.
  4. Signed face tensors give m=(s⁺+s⁻)/2 and b=(s⁺−s⁻)/2. Shear uses total signed face stress once, including twist. Ratios are not summed; their maximum is a display statistic only.

Rule: an individual ratio >1 fails its nominal limit. All seven ratios ≤1, with qualified numerical prerequisites, give plywood strength PASS for the agreed separate panel checks. No summed interaction is used. A full ply-level or combined-load failure assessment is outside this verdict.

Largest h060 individual ratio over all elements: 0.9893. FRD nodal stresses are extrapolated/averaged; face samples do not bound interior transverse shear.

Only 1.075% below the assigned limit. This margin does not bound numerical or material-model uncertainty.

Material limitations

Primary product declaration. The report deliberately does not convert this preliminary characteristic check into a regulatory safety statement.

Appendix E · solver qualification, mesh convergence, stresses, and connector demand

Numerical evidence retained for the fixed model

Histograms of governing force and moment on all connectors
Complete population; no clipping. Governing near/far/ground wrench selected once per connector.
Wind force components and magnitude by plywood slice station
All 65 physical stations; sums use the included smoothed field at the 1.3 analysis factor.

Current nonlinear endpoint — wind ×1.3

MeshMaximum deflectionLargest separate ratioEquilibriumTangent
h060111.246 mm0.989253PASSPASS

4 accepted hold/continuation increments, 0 cutbacks, at most 2 Newton iterations per increment. Force/moment equilibrium errors 9.12e-07 / 1.77e-06 (limit 0.001).

Separate plywood actions — all elements included

ActionMaximum stress / characteristic strength
membrane 10.521890
membrane 20.416357
bending 10.621233
bending 20.568444
panel shear 120.593623
rolling shear 230.744413
planar shear 310.989253

Qualified solver and constraints

CalculiX 2.23 with explicit constrained-tangent repair. Independent checks cover orthotropic plate response, rigid connector motion/reactions, positive and negative analytical stiffness, and restart equivalence.

Oriented nodal *COUPLING + *KINEMATIC; no *RIGID BODY. Assembly, stress and factorization use four threads; triangular substitution is serial.

Retained mesh quality

Native mesh validation passes. The h060 mesh retains 26,679 corner-edge instances below the nominal 30 mm floor; its minimum is 0.0482 mm. Exact contours and connector-patch intersections create these short local edges.

Global targets differ from actual nodal spacing. The h090/h060 comparison is explained in Appendix H; sampled stability acceptance does not claim convergence of every local stress peak.

Appendix F · software, artifacts, provenance, limitations, and next evidence

Reproducibility record and interpretation boundary

Software recorded by the run

SoftwareVersion / commitRole
FluidX3Dnot recordedD3Q19 LBM wind load
calculix_ccx2.23Synchronized SPOOLES: 4-thread assembly/factorization/stresses; serial triangular substitution; ARPACK eigenvalues
calculix_cgxinstalled; banner unavailableCalculiX native postprocessor
gmsh4.15.2-gitOCC geometry and quadratic S6 meshing
blender5.2.1EEVEE scenes, stills, and animation
ffmpeg9.0.1H.264 encoding and media validation
Python3.13.13typed orchestration and reduction

Primary references: FluidX3D, CalculiX, Gmsh, and Blender EEVEE.

Review artifacts

Stored native evidence

Gmsh .msh/.geo_unrolled; CalculiX .inp, .dat, .frd, logs, convergence and status files; Zarr v3 arrays with one Zstandard-compressed chunk per array.

Limitations that prevent a structural PASS

  • The source is a finite-window mean LBM field. Temporal stationarity does not bound spatial, domain or turbulence-model errors.
  • The current 1.3 multiplier is user-selected and does not represent gusts, turbulence peaks, a probability level, or a design standard.
  • The 112.5° direction was selected by a discrete tight-box angular screen; the completed finer run supplies its force magnitude, not a new continuous angular maximum.
  • CFD uses 24 mm cells; one aerodynamic cell is 2.00× the physical plywood thickness.
  • Separate panel-action checks (nonlinear): FAIL. Ply maximum-stress still lacks veneer data, layup and qualified ply/core stress recovery.
  • Conditional elastic stability: PASS. No damage, Riks continuation, or collapse-load prediction is included.
  • Rigid connectors, bonded ground, and characteristic plywood properties omit real joint/foundation behaviour and design factors.
  • The sibling FluidX3D experiment tooling was not fully committed; report hashes preserve evidence files, but its base commit alone is insufficient to reproduce every sweep.

Scope and further design evidence

The assessment uses the h060 endpoint for plywood and 1000 N / 100 N m connector checks, and the accepted h090/h060 sampled stability evidence. No additional mesh is required. Actual veneer/bond data, construction verification and design-wind validation would be needed for stronger claims outside this assessment.

Evidence hashes used by this HTML report

InputSHA-256
structural force metadata
/Users/vladimir/Documents/src/projects/cat-strength-calculator/stl/cfd_112p5_24mm_y_full/structural_cell_force_metadata.txt
3649c12874b23ea7e5aeba3bc00fbdcf02d8c1b5e222c8c4f67574835b4f8a5a
structural force CSV
/Users/vladimir/Documents/src/projects/cat-strength-calculator/stl/cfd_112p5_24mm_y_full/cell_force_means.csv
8e12b5e80c6343604d4262623086eb5f13559c2377775108e561f9445c9f870a
CFD source parameters
/Users/vladimir/Documents/src/projects/FluidX3D/results/cat_slice_wind_angle_112p5_30ms_box_y_expanded_grid_24mm_d2x1x1_full/parameters.json
2d4c44f85f3fec1d7defd22fead5e8fc67ac03e6631ebc20d128f68f475b1c00
CFD source force summary
/Users/vladimir/Documents/src/projects/FluidX3D/results/cat_slice_wind_angle_112p5_30ms_box_y_expanded_grid_24mm_d2x1x1_full/force_summary.txt
67d321663846e4eb1bea0e0bd81c06eb814e0ced1043d6e8e8e33c38df7098c7
CFD source geometry report
/Users/vladimir/Documents/src/projects/FluidX3D/results/cat_slice_wind_angle_112p5_30ms_box_y_expanded_grid_24mm_d2x1x1_full/mesh_bounding_box_report.txt
24d74ec401ad01c2d2c36696327bcba41e62b1c98af0015b2f17cd1556ff6c5c
CFD angular sweep
/Users/vladimir/Documents/src/projects/FluidX3D/results/cat_slice_wind_sweep_16_short/force_sweep_summary.csv
f9448282435dd7758b9fe4cc6c0515d6449c302a42911dc5d5a8e5cd76f8d601
CFD grid sweep
/Users/vladimir/Documents/src/projects/FluidX3D/results/cat_slice_wind_grid_sweep_112p5_short/grid_sweep_summary.csv
2ecaf3f5728dfdba28ed4060548696d6c4123b1f527ce0525db558a0acecb7d8
CFD boundary sweep
/Users/vladimir/Documents/src/projects/FluidX3D/results/cat_slice_wind_boundary_sweep_112p5_30mm_short/boundary_sweep_summary.csv
8991d076399b48e4fc631a0dbac69f5d6d51b093f6ba230eeb3d9685e0f729f0

The complete list, including copied visualizations, is retained in results/metadata/html_report.json. Structural configuration SHA-256: f7c4bf1001d755c506b12781fc8359b6cdab3ebb7a4c39005db58c9b449aeb90.

Appendix H · current assessment and mesh interpretation

Buckling stability at wind ×1.3

PASS — accepted sampled-path stability check.

The current h060 nonlinear solution includes full gravity and ×1.3 wind. Exact-load numerical status: PASS; constrained tangent: PASS. The retained h090/h060 meshes also passed all seven sampled checks up to ×1.5 wind. This is supporting stability evidence, not a change to the report's applied load.

What h090 and h060 mean

MeshGlobal targetS6 nodesS6 elementsMedian nodal interval
h09090 mm148,68964,89327.000 mm
h06060 mm207,57892,37822.729 mm

These are two discretizations of the same geometry, plywood law, grain realization, supports, connectors and force field—not different physical models. h090 uses a 90 mm global target and h060 a 60 mm target. Quadratic midside nodes, exact silhouettes and 108 mm connector patches set smaller local spacings. The CFD lattice is independently 24 mm.

h060 is the finer structural mesh and supplies the current stress, connector and deflection fields. No extra mesh or unfinished mesh case is part of the accepted report scope.

Retained sampled-path verification

MeshPassed checksMaximum at verification load
h0907 / 7128.89 mm
h0607 / 7129.65 mm

At the ×1.5 verification endpoint, deflections differ by 0.59%. The largest shell/connector displacement change across all common sampled states is 1.288%, below the 5% gate. These verification-load deflections are not the current ×1.3 demand of 111.246 mm.

The seven states cover zero/half/full gravity and 25/50/75/100% of verification wind. Each requires force/moment equilibrium, a complete independent-DOF operator and positive qualified tangent stiffness. The exact ×1.3 endpoint supplies an additional check at the assessed load.

Hash-verified sampled stability assessment; source SHA-256 1eed8e87344eb011727c7787bf1d0b91ebf72bef32fc4c2c4dfe6b6d8d23502e.

Scope of PASS

PASS applies to the accepted sampled, ideal-geometry buckling-stability check. It is not an ultimate buckling multiplier, proof of stability between every sampled state, untested imperfection coverage, or certification. Plywood and connector capacities are checked separately at the current load.

Latest nonlinear endpoint · h060 · wind ×1.3

Repaired-solver deformation and connector demand

New nonlinear true-scale original and deformed front projection
Exact nonlinear endpoint, gravity plus 1.3× source wind; true-scale projection.
New nonlinear connector force and moment distributions

Force mean/std/max 127.37/151.86/722.90 N. Moment mean/std/max 10.81/13.21/85.02 N m. Separate force/moment capacity ratios: 0.7229 / 0.8502.

Separate plywood actionMaximum stress/strength ratio
membrane_10.521890
membrane_20.416357
bending_10.621233
bending_20.568444
panel_shear_120.593623
rolling_shear_230.744413
planar_shear_310.989253

Governing location: C032, element 28403, node 31632, positive face. XYZ (-1.9140, 0.4372, 0.7718) m.

All regions included; no action ratios added. Endpoint equilibrium: PASS. Separate force/moment limits: PASS / PASS. Face-node transverse shear is a panel screening value, not qualified ply/core through-thickness recovery. Reduction and source hashes.